Consider the following statements with reference to the amendability of Fundamental Rights in India:
1. Presently, the Parliament has unlimited power to amend the Fundamental Rights in India.
2. In the Golaknath Case (1967), the Supreme Court had held that the parliament does not have power to amend Fundamental Rights.
3. In the Minerva Mills Case, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19 can be amended to give effect to directive principles.
How many of the above given statements is/are correct?