Linguistic Authority and Historical Documentation

The second and third statements are accurate. Prem Behari Narain Raizada handwritten the original Constitution in both Hindi and English, and the 58th Amendment (1987) authorized the President to publish an authoritative Hindi text. The first statement is false because the original physical artifacts were not exclusive to English; there was also a beautifully handwritten Hindi version.

The Assertion is true; the authoritative Hindi text was established in 1987. Reason 2 correctly identifies the 58th Amendment as the mechanism for this. Reason 1 is historically false because the original drafters did not ignore Hindi; they commissioned Prem Behari Narain Raizada to produce a beautiful, handwritten calligraphy version of the Constitution in Hindi alongside the English one.

The second reality is accurate. In 1985, there was no provision for a legally 'authoritative' text of the Constitution in Hindi. It was the 58th Amendment Act of 1987 (inserting Article 394-A) that finally authorized the President to publish an authoritative Hindi translation. While a handwritten Hindi copy existed from 1950, it did not possess the specific legal weight of the later 'authoritative' text.

All three claims are highly verifiable. The original was handwritten in both languages (by Prem Behari Narain Raizada). Decades later, the 58th Amendment (1987) authorized the President to publish the authoritative text in Hindi.