Type 1: EVIDENCE INFERENCE

In the context of the complex diplomatic negotiations following the early Maratha conflicts, evaluate the following evidence and subsequent inferences:

Evidence: In 1782, the British and the Peshwa signed the Treaty of Salbai to formally conclude years of exhausting military campaigns.

Inference 1: The agreement dictated a strict compromise where the English retained Salsette, but were forced to leave Bassein with the Marathas.

Inference 2: The agreement forced the Marathas to surrender all their territories and permanently give up their right to collect chauth from the Nizam.

Click an option to test yourself

Detailed Solution & Context

The correct answer is A.

Core Idea

  • Treaty of Salbai ended the First Anglo-Maratha war in 1782.
  • English kept Salsette, Marathas kept Bassein.
  • Giving up chauth happened later under the Treaty of Bassein (1802).

Detailed Solution:

Inference 1 describes the exact historical compromise. The First Anglo-Maratha War was a stalemate. The resulting Treaty of Salbai was an even trade; the British were allowed to keep the valuable island of Salsette, but they had to officially acknowledge Maratha control over Bassein.

Distractor & Trap:

Inference 2 is a dangerous timeline trap. Giving up the profitable 'chauth' tax rights was a devastating blow that happened much later. That specific punishment was forced upon the Marathas under the Treaty of Bassein in 1802, during the Second War.
Type 2: ASSERTION REASON

Regarding the diplomatic conclusions of the brutal conflicts in western India, analyze the following assertions related to the Peshwa:

Assertion (A): The famous Treaty of Salbai was successfully signed by the warring parties in the year 1782.

Reason (R1): It was drafted to officially mark the end of the exhausting First Anglo-Maratha War.

Reason (R2): It was drafted to legally transfer both the territories of Salsette and Bassein entirely into British hands.

Click an option to test yourself

Detailed Solution & Context

The correct answer is A.

Core Idea

  • Treaty of Salbai was signed in 1782.
  • It ended the First Anglo-Maratha War.
  • Bassein was NOT handed over to the British; it stayed with Marathas.

Detailed Solution:

The assertion is a basic historical fact. Reason 1 provides the correct context; both sides were tired of fighting the First Anglo-Maratha War, so they agreed to peace in 1782 to rebuild their armies.

Distractor & Trap:

Reason 2 is a complete fabrication regarding the territory. The British did not win both prizes. While they stubbornly held onto Salsette, they were legally forced by the treaty to leave Bassein alone. Claiming they got both is a common historical error.
Type 3: SCENARIO

Assume you are the lead British diplomat sent to negotiate with the Peshwa in 1782. Your goal is to secure a peace treaty that matches the actual historical outcome of Salbai. Which of the following Actions do you include in the final document?

Action 1: Demanding that the British East India Company retains permanent ownership of Salsette.

Action 2: Agreeing that the crucial territory of Bassein will remain under the control of the Marathas.

Action 3: Forcing the Maratha leaders to officially surrender their rights to collect chauth from the Nizam.

Click an option to test yourself

Detailed Solution & Context

The correct answer is B.

Core Idea

  • Treaty of Salbai gave Salsette to the English.
  • Treaty of Salbai left Bassein with the Marathas.
  • Surrendering chauth was part of the 1802 Treaty of Bassein.

Detailed Solution:

Actions 1 and 2 perfectly describe the delicate compromise of 1782. The British negotiators successfully kept the island of Salsette, but they had to compromise and allow the Marathas to keep their grip on Bassein to get the treaty signed.

Distractor & Trap:

Action 3 is the fatal trap. If you put that in the 1782 document, you fail history. The crushing demand to give up the 'chauth' tax revenues was not achieved until the Treaty of Bassein in 1802, following the brutal Second Anglo-Maratha War.
Type 4: HOW MANY

Consider the following pairings related to the long struggle between the colonial forces and the Maratha Empire. How many of the following pairs are correctly matched?

Statement 1: Treaty of Salbai : Signed to end the First Anglo-Maratha War

Statement 2: Treaty of Bassein : Forced the Marathas to surrender claims for chauth

Statement 3: Treaty of Salbai : Handed both Bassein and Salsette entirely to the British

Click an option to test yourself

Detailed Solution & Context

The correct answer is B.

Core Idea

  • Treaty of Salbai ended First Anglo-Maratha War.
  • Treaty of Bassein made Marathas give up chauth.
  • Treaty of Salbai did NOT give both territories to British (Marathas kept Bassein).

Detailed Solution:

Statements 1 and 2 are absolutely correct. Salbai successfully paused the First war. Years later, the harsh Treaty of Bassein broke Maratha financial power by stripping them of their right to collect taxes (chauth) from the Nizam's lands.

Distractor & Trap:

Statement 3 is a deliberate lie regarding the map. The Treaty of Salbai was a split decision. The British got Salsette, but the Marathas firmly held onto Bassein. Claiming the British got both is a common trick used to test precision.

🚨 The Examiner's Trap (Entity Swap)

The Bait: Swapping the terms of the Treaty of Salbai with the much harsher Treaty of Bassein (1802), or reversing who got which city.

The Reality: Salbai ended the First war with a land swap (English got Salsette, Marathas kept Bassein). Bassein ended the Second war with Marathas giving up chauth rights.

⚡ Deck Revision (1/3)

Concept Flow Mapping

Treaty of Salbai
ended
First Anglo-Maratha War
British
retained
Salsette
Marathas
retained
Bassein

Logic Quest

"How did the Treaty of Salbai divide the disputed coastal territories?"

The British retained control over Salsette, while they returned control of Bassein to the Marathas.

Topic Clusters

Treaty of SalbaiTreaty of Bassein

Not practicing core concepts like Diplomatic Stalemate and Territorial Compromise using the latest UPSC exam pattern is a serious miss-out that can drastically reduce your chances of clearing Prelims. This interactive engine is specifically designed to help you master highly probable Modern Indian History questions across all emerging analytical formats: Type 1 (Evidence-Inference), Type 2 (Assertion-Reason), Type 3 (Scenario-Based), and the dreaded Type 4 (Multi-Statement "How Many").