Select the constitutional frameworks that were explicitly adapted from the legal architecture of Australia:

1. The establishment of a tertiary legislative matrix known as the Concurrent List.

2. The specialized legislative procedure required for the amendment of the Constitution.

3. The structural blueprint of a Federation characterized by a highly centralized authority.

4. The procedural mechanism allowing a joint sitting of both parliamentary chambers.

5. The constitutional guarantee ensuring the freedom of trade, commerce, and interstate intercourse.

⚡ Generate AI Quick Summary

Correct Option: B

The Indian Constitution derived the Concurrent List from the Australian Constitution. The mechanism for joint parliamentary sittings was also borrowed from Australia. Australia inspired the constitutional freedoms regarding interstate trade and commerce.

A. Only the first, second, and fourth frameworks are accurate
B. Only the first, fourth, and fifth frameworks are accurate
C. Only the second, third, and fifth frameworks are accurate
D. Only the second, third, fourth, and fifth frameworks are accurate

Solution

The first, fourth, and fifth frameworks were borrowed from Australia (Concurrent List, Joint Sitting, and Freedom of trade/commerce). The second statement is false because the amendment procedure was borrowed from the South African Constitution. The third statement is false because the model of a Federation with a strong Centre was borrowed from the Canadian Constitution.

🚨 The Examiner's Trap

Test-takers frequently confuse federal features, misattributing the 'Federation with a strong Centre' to Australia rather than Canada, and mistaking the amendment procedure's origin for Australia rather than South Africa.

Concept Flow Mapping

Indian Constitution
derived
Concurrent List
Mechanism
borrowed from
Australian Constitution
Australia
inspired
trade freedoms

Tap to Flip Card

From which country did the Indian Constitution borrow the concept of the Concurrent List and Joint Sittings?

The Australian Constitution.

Historical Logic Quest

"Which specific legislative deadlock mechanism did the Indian framers lift directly from the Australian Constitution?"

The framers lifted the procedure of holding a 'Joint sitting of the two Houses of Parliament' to resolve legislative deadlocks.

Not practicing the latest UPSC exam pattern questions is a serious miss-out that can drastically reduce your chances of getting through Prelims. This interactive engine is specifically designed to help you practice highly probable UPSC Practice Questions across all emerging analytical formats: Type 1 (Evidence-Inference), Type 2 (Assertion-Reason), Type 3 (Scenario-Based), and the dreaded Type 4 (Multi-Statement "How Many").