Critique the historical advisory reports generated to manage the reorganization of provincial boundaries post-independence:

1. The 1948 Dhar Commission explicitly advised that internal borders be redrawn prioritizing administrative efficiency over linguistic homogeneity.

2. The 1953 Fazl Ali Commission formally endorsed the radical 'one language-one state' doctrine to settle regional disputes.

3. The Fazl Ali Commission maintained that financial viability and overarching administrative logistics must remain primary factors in any territorial restructuring.

⚡ Generate AI Quick Summary

Correct Option: B

The Dhar Commission of 1948 recommended reorganizing states based on administrative convenience, rejecting language as a sole factor. The Fazl Ali Commission of 1953 accepted language broadly but rejected the 'one language-one state' theory. Economic and administrative viability remained crucial considerations.

A. Only the first and second advisory reports are historically accurate
B. Only the first and third advisory reports are historically accurate
C. Only the second and third advisory reports are historically accurate
D. All three advisory reports are historically accurate

Solution

The first and third statements are accurate. The Dhar Commission (1948) rejected language in favor of administrative convenience. The Fazl Ali Commission (1953) accepted language broadly, but still prioritized financial, economic, and administrative considerations. The second statement is false because the Fazl Ali Commission explicitly rejected the extreme 'one language-one state' theory, warning against creating massive linguistic monoliths.

🚨 The Examiner's Trap

Candidates often assume that because India eventually adopted linguistic states, the early commissions (like Dhar) must have immediately supported the idea, or that Fazl Ali adopted a pure, radical 'one language-one state' mandate, missing the highly cautious, balanced reality of their reports.

Concept Flow Mapping

Dhar Commission
recommended
administrative convenience reorganization
Fazl Ali Commission
rejected
one language-one state theory
Economic viability
remained
crucial consideration

Tap to Flip Card

Did the Fazl Ali Commission of 1953 support the theory of 'one language-one state'?

No, while it accepted language as a broad basis, it explicitly rejected the rigid 'one language-one state' theory.

Historical Logic Quest

"What nuance separated the Fazl Ali Commission's view on language from the rigid demands of linguistic nationalists?"

While the Fazl Ali Commission finally accepted language as a broad basis for state boundaries, it explicitly rejected the extremist 'one language-one state' theory, insisting that administrative, economic, and national unity concerns must also weigh equally.

Not practicing the latest UPSC exam pattern questions is a serious miss-out that can drastically reduce your chances of getting through Prelims. This interactive engine is specifically designed to help you practice highly probable UPSC Practice Questions across all emerging analytical formats: Type 1 (Evidence-Inference), Type 2 (Assertion-Reason), Type 3 (Scenario-Based), and the dreaded Type 4 (Multi-Statement "How Many").