UPSC CSE Pre 2019

Mughal Revenue and Land System

Authentic Past Paper Standard Evaluation

With reference to Mughal India, what is/are the difference/differences between Jagirdar and Zamindar? 1. Jagirdars were holders of land assignments in lieu of judicial and police duties, whereas Zamindars were holders of revenue rights without obligation to perform any duty other than revenue collection. 2. Land assignments to Jagirdars were hereditary and revenue rights of Zamindars were not hereditary. Select the correct answer using the code given below.

Solution & Analysis

Answer: D

Concept The Mughal revenue system relied on two distinct classes: the Jagirdars (state officials) and the Zamindars (local landed elites). Understanding the difference between their rights and duties is key to understanding Mughal stability.

Explanation Zamindars were local landholders with hereditary rights. They assisted in revenue collection and local security. Jagirdars were state officers (often Mansabdars) who received land assignments (Jagirs) to collect revenue as their salary. These assignments were non-hereditary and frequently transferred to prevent them from becoming local power centers.

Logical Breakup
Logic 1 (Statement 1): Incorrect. Both groups had administrative and military duties. Zamindars maintained soldiers and helped in local governance, while Jagirdars primarily focused on revenue in exchange for their service to the Emperor.
Logic 2 (Statement 2): Incorrect. It is actually the opposite—Zamindari rights were usually hereditary, while Jagirdari assignments were strictly non-hereditary and temporary.

Active Recall

Question

Why were Jagirdars frequently transferred by the Mughal Emperor?

Answer

To prevent them from developing deep local roots or building a regional power base that could challenge the central authority of the Emperor.

Core Insight

The Zamindar was a local 'owner' with deep social roots, whereas the Jagirdar was a 'manager' representing the imperial state.