Constitutional Objectives of Brotherhood

The second and third statements are accurate. The explicit text of the Preamble states that 'Fraternity' assures two distinct things: the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the nation. The first statement is false in this context; the provision of 'equal status and opportunity' is explicitly secured by the ideal of 'Equality', not 'Fraternity'.

The Assertion is true; the framers relied on brotherhood (fraternity) for cohesion. Reason 1 correctly supports this by quoting the Preamble's exact definition of Fraternity (dignity and unity/integrity). Reason 2 is conceptually false because guaranteeing 'equal status and opportunity' is the explicitly defined role of 'Equality', not Fraternity.

The second evaluation is correct. The activist has cited the wrong philosophical ideal. Under the strict text of the Preamble, 'Equality' is the ideal that secures 'status and of opportunity'. The ideal of 'Fraternity' is deployed specifically to assure 'the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation'.

Only two outcomes are aligned (Statements 2 and 3: individual dignity and national unity). Statement 1 is false in this specific context because an egalitarian framework securing equal status and civic opportunity is the textual definition of 'Equality' in the Preamble, not 'Fraternity'.