Delhi Sultanate Administration | Amil, Iqta, Mir Bakshi
The only correct statement is that 'Amils' were in charge of revenue collection. The Iqta system was a Persian import, and 'Mir Bakshi' was a Mughal office, not a Sultanate one.
Primary Reference: NCERT Class VII - Our Pasts II
Archived:
Updated:
Exam Year
2019
Evidence Source
UPSC Level
Consider the following statements:
1. In the revenue administration of Delhi Sultanate, the in-charge of revenue collection was known as 'Amil'.
2. The Iqta system of Sultans of Delhi was an ancient indigenous institution.
3. The office of 'Mir Bakshi' came into existence during the reign of Khalji Sultans of Delhi.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
[UPSC CSE Prelims 2019]
Detailed Solution & Historical Context
Concept
The administrative structure of the Delhi Sultanate was a mix of Persian, Central Asian, and local Indian elements. Terms like Amil and Iqta are central to understanding land revenue.
Authentic Source Evidence
Satish Chandra’s Medieval India notes that Amils were revenue collectors. The Iqta system was a Persian institution introduced to India by the Ghorids/Sultans. Mir Bakshi was a Mughal administrative post.
Analytical Breakdown
Conceptual Deep Dive & Logic
"How did the Iqta system differ from traditional feudalism?"
Examiner's Mindset & Pro-Tip
"The Sultanate administration systematically replaced local titles with Persian ones, though local intermediaries like Chaudharys remained vital."
Topic Clusters (click to see related topic questions)
Analysing authentic UPSC CSE Prelimsprevious year questions is non-negotiable for serious aspirants. Thoroughly decoding past exam trends related to Delhi Sultanate Administration helps you understand the examiner's mindset. Mastering specific entities like Amil revenue collection and Iqta system origin builds the analytical intuition needed to clear the exam. Practice Previous Year Questions here →