Buddhist Patronage: Pala vs Ikshvaku Dynasty Facts
The Pala rulers were major patrons of Buddhism in Eastern India. In contrast, the Ikshvaku rulers were generally Vedic followers but not antagonistic to Buddhism; in fact, their queens often supported Buddhist monuments.
Primary Reference: Standard Educational Reference
Archived:
Updated:
Exam Year
2006
Evidence Source
Link ↗Consider the following statements:
1. The Ikshvaku rulers of Southern India were antagonistic towards Buddhism.
2. The Pala rulers of Eastern India were Patrons of Buddhism. Which of the statement(s) given above is/ are correct?
[UPSC CSE Prelims 2006]
Detailed Solution & Historical Context
Concept
The survival and expansion of Buddhism in India were heavily dependent on the varying degrees of patronage provided by regional dynasties.
Authentic Source Evidence
The Pala dynasty (Bengal/Bihar) was the last major royal patron of Buddhism in India, establishing great universities like Vikramashila. The Ikshvakus (Andhra region) were generally Vedic practitioners but not strictly 'antagonistic'.
Analytical Breakdown
Conceptual Deep Dive & Logic
"Which major Buddhist university was founded by the Pala king Dharmapala?"
Examiner's Mindset & Pro-Tip
"The Ikshvaku example shows that religious life in ancient India was often pluralistic, with different members of the same royal household supporting different faiths."
Topic Clusters (click to see related topic questions)
Analysing authentic UPSC CSE Prelimsprevious year questions is non-negotiable for serious aspirants. Thoroughly decoding past exam trends related to Royal Patronage of Religions helps you understand the examiner's mindset. Mastering specific entities like Pala dynasty Buddhism and Ikshvaku rulers religious policy builds the analytical intuition needed to clear the exam. Practice Previous Year Questions here →