[Solved] Kings of the Parmar Dynasty | Mismatch Identification

Who among the following was not a king of the Parmar dynasty?

[M.P.P.C.S. Prelims 2017]

Detailed Solution & Historical Context

Concept

Distinguishing between the various regional dynasties of the 10th-12th centuries (Parmaras, Kalachuris, Chandelas) requires knowledge of their specific king-lists and regional capitals.

Authentic Source Evidence

Gangeyadev (r. 1015–1041 CE) was a powerful king of the Kalachuri dynasty of Tripuri, not the Parmaras. The other three—Upendra (founder), Munja, and Udayaditya—were all prominent Parmar rulers of Malwa.

Analytical Breakdown

Logic 1: Option C is the mismatch. Gangeyadev was a contemporary of Raja Bhoj and a rival for dominance in Central India.

Logic 2: Upendra (A) founded the dynasty; Munja (B) was a great warrior-poet; and Udayaditya (D) was responsible for building the Udayeshwar temple.

Conceptual Deep Dive & Logic

"Where was the capital of the Parmar dynasty located?"

The capital of the Parmaras was originally at Ujjain and later shifted to Dhara (modern-day Dhar, MP).

Examiner's Mindset & Pro-Tip

"The overlap in names and contemporary reigns between the Kalachuris and Parmaras often leads to confusion in tracing Central Indian history."

Topic Clusters (click to see related topic questions)

Kalachuri Dynasty 4

Analysing authentic M.P.P.C.S. Prelimsprevious year questions is non-negotiable for serious aspirants. Thoroughly decoding past exam trends related to Regional Dynasties of Central India helps you understand the examiner's mindset. Mastering specific entities like Parmara dynasty kings and Gangeyadev builds the analytical intuition needed to clear the exam. Practice Previous Year Questions here →