Ancient Indian Epigraphy

Matching Ancient Inscriptions: Facts and Mismatches

The pair 'Sarvaverman : Gaya Copper Plate' is incorrect. The Gaya Copper Plate inscription actually belongs to the Gupta emperor Samudragupta.

Primary Reference: Standard Educational Reference

Archived:

Updated:

Which one of the following pairs is not correctly matched?

[UPPCS (Pre) 2022]

Detailed Solution & Historical Context

Concept


Epigraphy (the study of inscriptions) provides precise chronological and genealogical data for ancient Indian dynasties, but requires accurate matching of specific artifacts to specific rulers.

Authentic Source Evidence


The Gaya Copper Plate inscription is associated with Samudragupta, not Sarvaverman. It records a village grant to a Brahmin in the 9th year of Samudragupta's reign.

Analytical Breakdown


  • Logic 1 (Mismatch): Sarvaverman was a Maukhari ruler, whereas the Gaya Copper Plate belongs to the Imperial Gupta king Samudragupta.

  • Logic 2 (Correct Pair): Ishwarverman is correctly linked to the Jaunpur Stone Inscription, which mentions his victory over the Hunas.

  • Logic 3 (Correct Pair): Ishanverman is correctly linked to the Harha Stone Inscription, detailing his conquests in Magadha and Malwa.

  • Logic 4 (Correct Pair): Jivit Gupta II is correctly linked to the Deva Barnark Inscription regarding land grants.
  • Conceptual Deep Dive & Logic

    "What does the Gaya Copper Plate record?"

    It records the grant of two villages by Samudragupta to a Brahmin named Jayabhatta.

    Examiner's Mindset & Pro-Tip

    "Accurate epigraphic matching is vital for distinguishing between the overlapping regional powers like the Guptas and the Maukharis."

    Topic Clusters (click to see related topic questions)

    UPSC Question Bank | Verified
    Live Archive Status