Early Buddhist Literature: Canonical vs Non-Canonical
Early Buddhist literature includes both canonical and non-canonical texts. Various Buddhist schools used different classification systems, such as Pitakas, Angas, or Agamas.
Primary Reference: Standard Educational Reference
Archived:
Updated:
Exam Year
2014
Evidence Source
Link ↗Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
1. Early Buddhist literature is generally composed of the canonical text.
2. The Buddhist schools classify their canonical literature as only the Pitakas.Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
[CDS 2014 (II)]
Detailed Solution & Historical Context
Concept
Buddhist literature is a vast collection of both internal canonical scriptures and external commentaries, chronicles, and philosophical treatises.
Authentic Source Evidence
Early Buddhist literature includes not just the Tripitakas but also non-canonical works like the Milindapanha, the Dipavamsa, and the Mahavamsa. Furthermore, different schools used different classification systems, such as the nine or twelve Angas (limbs) used by early sects like the Mahasanghikas.
Analytical Breakdown
Conceptual Deep Dive & Logic
"What are the 'Angas' in Buddhist literature?"
Examiner's Mindset & Pro-Tip
"The classification of Buddhist texts evolved over centuries, reflecting the internal debates and linguistic shifts within different Buddhist councils."
Topic Clusters (click to see related topic questions)
Analysing authentic CDS (II)previous year questions is non-negotiable for serious aspirants. Thoroughly decoding past exam trends related to Buddhist Literary Traditions helps you understand the examiner's mindset. Mastering specific entities like Buddhist literature and Pitakas builds the analytical intuition needed to clear the exam. Practice Previous Year Questions here →